Download OD PDF

TitleOD
TagsNegligence Society Social Institutions Tort Duty Of Care
File Size285.0 KB
Total Pages34
Table of Contents
                            TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
INDEX OF AUTHORITIES
STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION
STATEMENT OF FACTS
ISSUES RAISED
SUMMARY OF ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS ADVANCED
	I. THAT THERE IS NO DIRECT AND PROXIMATE NEXUS BETWEEN THE POLLUTION CAUSED BY  DML AND THE CONSEQUENTIAL EFFECTS IN THE MOHANA REGION
		A. DRASTIC CHANGES WERE OBSERVED
		B. NO CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE.
	II. THAT DML CANNOT BE HELD TORTIOUSLY LIABLE
		A. THAT THERE EXISTED A DUTY OF CARE
		B. THAT THERE WAS A BREACH OF THE DUTY OF CARE
		C. THAT DAMAGES RESULTING FROM THE BREACH OF DUTY
	III. THAT THERE IS VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 14 OF THE CONSTITUTION
		A. RATIONALE BEHIND THE DIRECTIVE
		B. THE REASON BEHIND THE WRONG DECISION
	IV. THAT THERE IS A VIOLATION OF THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE DIRECTORS AND THE EMPLOYEES OF THE COMPANY
		A. INFRINGEMENT OF THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO TRADE OF THE DIRECTORS OF DML.
		B. INFRINGEMENT OF THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO LIVELIHOOD OF THE EMPLOYEES OF DML
PRAYER
                        

Similer Documents