Download Integrated modeling of friction stir welding of 6xxx series Al alloys PDF

TitleIntegrated modeling of friction stir welding of 6xxx series Al alloys
LanguageEnglish
File Size3.3 MB
Total Pages89
Table of Contents
                            1 Introduction
	2 The friction stir welding process
		2.1 Principle of the friction stir welding process and its main features
		2.2 Microstructural zones in a friction stir weld
	3 Individual model description and validation
		3.1 Thermal model of the friction stir welding process
			3.1.1 Overview of literature on thermo-mechanical process models
				3.1.1.1 Thermal models neglecting material flow
				3.1.1.2 Models accounting for the convective heat flow
				3.1.1.3 Models accounting for material flow with coupling
				3.1.1.4 Contact conditions at the workpiece/backing plate interface
			3.1.2 Thermal model for an integrated process model
				3.1.2.1 Heat dissipated by friction at the tool/workpiece interface – surface heat sources
				3.1.2.2 Heat dissipated by plastic deformation – volume heat sources
				3.1.2.3 Distribution of mechanical power between volume and surface heat sources
				3.1.2.4 Material convection around the friction stir welding tool
				3.1.2.5 Contact condition at the workpiece/backing plate interface
				3.1.2.6 Model parameters
		3.2 Microstructure evolution in 6xxx series Al alloys
			3.2.1 Hardening precipitation in 6xxx series Al alloys
			3.2.2 Literature review on microstructure evolution models
				3.2.2.1 Internal variable approach
				3.2.2.2 Size class approach
			3.2.3 Microstructure evolution model
				3.2.3.1 Rate law
				3.2.3.2 Nucleation law
				3.2.3.3 Continuity equation and numerical discretization
				3.2.3.4 Extension to elongated precipitates
				3.2.3.5 Application to 6xxx series Al alloys
		3.3 Strength and strain hardening of precipitation hardened Al alloys
			3.3.1 Yield strength model
				3.3.1.1 Literature survey on yield strength models
				3.3.1.2 Yield strength model
				3.3.1.3 Natural aging model
				3.3.1.4 Model parameters
			3.3.2 Strain hardening model
				3.3.2.1 Strain hardening behavior of Al alloys
				3.3.2.2 Modeling strain hardening in age-hardenable Al alloys
				3.3.2.3 Strain hardening model - Dislocation sto
				3.3.2.4 Strain hardening model – dynamic recover
				3.3.2.5 Final expressions for θ and β
				3.3.2.6 Stage IV hardening
		3.4 Damage model for Al alloys
			3.4.1 Non-hardening precipitates in Al alloys
			3.4.2 Damage mechanisms in Al alloys
			3.4.3 Model description
				3.4.3.1 Main geometrical void parameters
				3.4.3.2 Void nucleation
				3.4.3.3 Void growth
				3.4.3.4 Void coalescence
				3.4.3.5 Influence of a second population of voids on coalescence
			3.4.4 Application to 6xxx series Al alloys
		3.5 Conclusions
	4 Integrated modeling applied to friction stir welding
		4.1 Principles of the integrated chain modeling
		4.2 Validation on friction stir welds in 6xxx series Al alloys
			4.2.1 Base materials
			4.2.2 Validation of the thermal model
				4.2.2.1 Measurement of the mechanical power
				4.2.2.2 Use of the vertical force to infer the mechanical power
				4.2.2.3 Assessment of the thermal model
			4.2.3 Validation of the microstructure evolution model
			4.2.4 Validation of the strength and strain hardening model
			4.2.5 Validation of the finite element modeling of the tensile test on welded samples
			4.2.6 Validation of the damage model
	5 Process optimization
		5.1 Optimization of the welding parameters
			5.1.1 Effects of the advancing and rotational speeds
			5.1.2 Effects of the preheating
			5.1.3 Effects of the cooling rate
			5.1.4 Effects of the material of the backing plate
		5.2 Alloy design
			5.2.1 Effect of the proportion of alloying elements
			5.2.2 Effect of the intermetallics content
			5.2.3 Effect of the alloy state before welding
		5.3 Effects of a post-welding heat treatment
		5.4 Summary
	6 Conclusions
	Acknowledgements
	References
                        
Document Text Contents
Page 1

HAL Id: hal-00664802
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00664802

Submitted on 7 Feb 2018

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

Integrated modeling of friction stir welding of 6xxx
series Al alloys: Process, microstructure and properties

A. Simar, Y. Brechet, B. de Meester, A. Denquin, C. Gallais, T. Pardoen

To cite this version:
A. Simar, Y. Brechet, B. de Meester, A. Denquin, C. Gallais, et al.. Integrated modeling of friction
stir welding of 6xxx series Al alloys: Process, microstructure and properties. Progress in Materials
Science, Elsevier, 2012, 57 (1), pp.95-183. �10.1016/j.pmatsci.2011.05.003�. �hal-00664802�

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00664802
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr

Page 2

gr23.eps


b

a w

the
Integrated modeling of friction stir welding of
6xxx series Al alloys: Process, microstructure
and properties
A. Simar a, Y. Bréchet b, B. de Meester a, A. Denquin c, C. Gallais c, T. Pardoen a

a Institute of Mechanics, Materials and Civil Engineering, Université catholique de Louvain, B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium

aP/INP Grenoble, Domaine Universitaire, 1130 rue de la Piscine, B.P. 75, 38 402 Saint Martin d’Heres Cedex, France
SIM

c ONERA, BP72 – 29 avenue de la Division Leclerc, 92322 Chatillon Cedex, France
Compared to most thermomechanical processing methods, friction stir welding (FSW) is a recent technique
which has not yet reached full maturity. Nevertheless, owing to multiple intrinsic advantages, FSW has
already replaced conventional welding methods in a variety of industrial applications especially for Al alloys.
This provides the impetus for developing a methodology towards optimization, from process to
performances, using the most advanced approach avail-able in materials science and thermomechanics. The
aim is to obtain a guidance both for process fine tuning and for alloy design. Inte-grated modeling constitutes
ay to accelerate the insertion of the process, especially regarding difficult applications where for instance

ductility, fracture toughness, fatigue and/or stress corro-sion cracking are key issues. Hence, an integrated
modeling frame-work devoted to the FSW of 6xxx series Al alloys has been established and applied to the
6005A and 6056 alloys. The suite of models involves an in-process temperature evolution model, a
microstructure evolution model with an extension to heterogeneous precipitation, a microstructure based
ngth and strain hardening model, and a micro-mechanics based damage model. The presenta-tion of each
stre
model is supplemented by the coverage of relevant recent literature. The ‘‘model chain’’ is assessed towards a
wide range of experimental data. The final objective is to present routes for the optimization of the FSW
process using both experiments and models. Now, this strategy goes well beyond the case of FSW, illustrating
potential of chain models to support a ‘‘material by design approach’’ from process to performances.
1. Introduction

Light metallic alloys are facing a fierce competition against structural polymer-based composite
materials in many structural applications, the most obvious being in aeronautical design. The search
for lighter structure keeps motivating investigations towards the enhancement of specific material
properties. If the mainstream effort in the case of Al alloys has long been based on the control of
the microstructure to improve the yield stress, toughness, fatigue resistance and corrosion resistance
1

Page 44

gr23.eps


Fig. 18. Evolution of the friction coefficient with the welding parameters for the 6005A-T6 welds.
Table 9 presents the uniaxial tensile properties of the 6005A and the 6056 Al alloys for various heat
treatments states. The T78 treatment is an overaged condition consisting of two successive isothermal
holdings of 6 h at 175 �C and 5 h at 210 �C. The 6005A-T6 base material used in the welds is 10%
weaker than the 6056-T78.

4.2.2. Validation of the thermal model
4.2.2.1. Measurement of the mechanical power. The thermal model presented in Section 3.1.2 has been
applied to welds produced for a variety of conditions both for the alloy 6005A in the T6 temper and for
the alloy 6056 in the T78 temper. The input of the thermal model are the total power Pin (W) for each
welding condition which is calculated based on the rotational speed x (rad/s), the torque Mz (Nm) and
the efficiency g, as P = gPin = Mzx [49]. The torque has been measured during welding [49,63] (most
dedicated FSW machines include a torque measurement). For the 6005A-T6 welds, the efficiency is
estimated by measuring the temperature during welding at two locations on the tool away from
the shoulder surface. The efficiency does almost not vary with the welding parameters and is close
to g � 0.95 [49].

Fig. 17 shows the variation of the torque, represented in terms of the variation of the corresponding
total mechanical power P as a function of the advancing speed for various rotational speeds and for
both alloys. Note that the welding parameters are different in the two alloys.7 A higher rotational
speed induces only a slightly larger power. The effect of the rotational speed on the total power is
more marked in the 6056 welds which could be explained by the more complex geometry of the tool
(i.e. a triflute tool) compared to the 6005A welds which were performed using a simply threaded pin.
The total power increases with increasing advancing speed in the 6005A-T6 welds while no pro-
nounced effect of the advancing speed can be observed in Fig. 17b for the 6056-T78 welds. Note how-
ever that for an advancing speed equal to 1000 mm/min the power of the 6005A-T6 welds and the
6056-T78 welds is similar, probably due to a minor difference in the room temperature yield strength
between the 6005A-T6 and 6056-T78 base materials, see Table 9. The variation of P with respect to the
advancing speed is almost linear P (kW) = 2.66 + 0.00322 � v (mm/min) [49] for low advancing speeds
and tends to saturate for high advancing speeds.

4.2.2.2. Use of the vertical force to infer the mechanical power. When the measurement of the torque is
not available, the measurement of the vertical force (Fz) could be used to infer the total power
7 The welds made of the 6005A alloy were performed with a very large span of welding parameters in order to test the extreme
welding parameters still giving sound welds. The welds made of the 6056-T78 alloy were performed in order to reach the best
tensile performances and hence the lower advancing speeds were not tested.

43

Page 45

(a)

(b)

(c)

Fig. 19. Assessment of the thermal model for various welding parameters applied to the 6005A alloy welds, see also Ref. [63].
Maximum temperatures at 7.2, 14 and 20 mm from the weldline on the advancing side of the weld.

44

Page 88

gr22.eps


[188] Nes E. Modelling of work hardening and stress saturation in FCC metals. Prog Mater Sci 1998;41:129–93.
[189] Nes E, Pettersen T, Marthinsen K. On the mechanism of work hardening and flow stress saturation. Scripta Mater

2000;43:55–62.
[190] Marthinsen K, Nes E. Modelling strain hardening and steady state deformation of Al–Mg alloys. Mater Sci Technol

2001;17:376–88.
[191] Nes E, Marthinsen K, Ronning B. Modelling the evolution in microstructure and properties during processing of

aluminium alloys. J Mater Process Technol 2001;117:333–40.
[192] Nes E, Marthinsen K. Modeling the evolution in microstructure and properties during plastic deformation of fcc-metals

and alloys – an approach towards a unified model. Mater Sci Eng A 2002;322:176–93.
[193] Roters F, Raabe D, Gottstein G. Work hardening in heterogeneous alloys – a microstructural approach based on three

internal state variables. Acta Mater 2000;48:4181–9.
[194] Goerdeler M, Gottstein G. A microstructural work hardening model based on three internal state variables. Mater Sci Eng

A 2001;309–310:377–81.
[195] Goerdeler M, Crumbach M, Schneider M, Gottstein G, Neumann L, Aretz H, et al. Dislocation density based modeling of

work hardening in the context of integrative modeling of aluminium processing. Mater Sci Eng A 2004;387–
389:266–371.

[196] Estrin Y. Dislocation-density-related constitutive modeling. In: Krausz AS, Krausz K, editors. Unified constitutive laws of
plastic deformation. San Diego: Academic Press; 1996. p. 9–106.

[197] Barlat F, Glazov MV, Brem JC, Lege DJ. A simple model for dislocation behavior, strain and strain arte hardening evolution
in deforming aluminium alloys. Int J Plasticity 2002;18:919–39.

[198] Poole WJ, Lloyd DJ. Modelling the stress–strain behaviour of aluminium alloy AA6111. In: Nie JF, Morton AJ, Muddle BC,
Inst Mater Eng Australasia Ltd., editors. Proc 9th int conf Al alloys; 2004.

[199] Reynolds AP, Baxter SC. Kinematic hardening in a dispersion strengthened aluminum alloy: experiment and modeling.
Mater Sci Eng A 2000;285:265–79.

[200] Proudhon H, Poole WJ, Wang X, Bréchet Y. The role of internal stresses on the plastic deformation of the Al–Mg–Si–Cu
alloy AA6111. Philos Mag 2008;88(5):621–40.

[201] Teixeira JD, Bourgeois L, Sinclair CW, Hutchinson CR. The effect of shear resistant, plate-shaped precipitates on the work
hardening of Al alloys: towards a prediction of the strength-elongation correlation. Acta Mater 2009;57:6075–89.

[202] Bréchet Y, Louchet F. On the stability of Orowan loops around coherent spherical ordered precipitates. Acta Metal
1989;37(9):2469–73.

[203] Argon AS, Haasen P. A new mechanism of work hardening in the late stages of large strain plastic flow in FCC and
diamond cubic crystals. Acta Mater 1993;390(41):3289–306.

[204] Liu YL. A study on flow stress of AlSiC composites deformed in a large range of strain. Scripta Mater 1996;35:2539.
[205] Gurson AL. Continuum theory of ductile rupture by void nucleation and growth: part I – yield criteria and flow rules for

porous ductile media. J Eng Mater Technol 1977;99:2–15.
[206] Broek D. The role of inclusions in ductile fracture and fracture toughness. Eng Fract Mech 1973;5:55–66.
[207] Huber G, Bréchet Y, Pardoen T. Predictive model for void nucleation and void growth controlled ductility in quasi-eutectic

cast aluminium alloys. Acta Mater 2005;53:2739–49.
[208] Asserin Lebert A, Besson J, Gourgues AF. Fracture of 6056 aluminium sheet materials: effect of specimen thickness and

hardening behavior on strain localization and toughness. Mater Sci Eng A 2005;395:186–94.
[209] Liu G, Sun J, Nan CW, Chen KH. Experiment and multiscale modeling of the coupled influence of constituents and

precipitates on the ductile fracture of heat-treatable aluminum alloys. Acta Mater 2005;53(12):3459–68.
[210] Liu G, Zhang GJ, Wang RH, Hu W, Sun J, Chen KH. Heat treatment-modulated coupling effect of multi-scale second-phase

particles on ductile fracture of aged aluminum alloys. Acta Mater 2007;55:273–84.
[211] Kuijpers NCW, Kool WH, Koenis PTG, Nilsen KE, Todd I, van der Zwaag S. Assessment of different techniques for

quantification of a-Al(FeMn)Si and b-AlFeSi intermetallics in AA 6xxx alloys. Mater Charact 2003;49:409–20.
[212] Kuijpers NCW, Kool WH, van der Zwaag S. DSC study on Mg–Si phases in as cast AA6xxx. Mater Sci Forum 2002;396–

402:675–80.
[213] Hirasawa H. Precipitation process of Al–Mn and Al–Cr supersaturated solid solution in presence of age hardening phases.

Scr Metal 1975;9:955–8.
[214] Lodgaard L, Ryum N. Precipitation of dispersoids containing Mn and/or Cr in Al–Mg–Si alloys. Mater Sci Eng A

2000;283:144–52.
[215] Pineau A. Review of fracture micromechanisms and a local approach to predicting crack resistance in low strength steels.

In: Francois D et al., editor. Advances in fracture research, Proc ICF 5. Cannes, France: Pergamon; 1981. p. 553–77.
[216] Tvergaard V. Material failure by void growth to coalescence. Adv Appl Mech 1990;27:83151.
[217] Rice JR, Tracey DM. On the ductile enlargement of voids in triaxial stress. J Mech Phys Solids 1969;17:201–17.
[218] Argon AS, Im J, Safoglu R. Cavity formation from inclusions in ductile fracture. Metal Trans A 1975;6:825–37.
[219] Urreta SE, Louchet F, Ghilarducci. Fracture behaviour of an Al–Mg–Si industrial alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 2001;302:300–7.
[220] Thomason PF. Ductile fracture of metals. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1990.
[221] Tvergaard V. Ductile fracture by cavity nucleation between larger voids. J Mech Phys Solids 1982;30:265–86.
[222] Faleskog J, Shih CF. Micromechanics of coalescence – I. Synergistic effects of elasticity, plastic yielding and multi-size-

scale voids. J Mech Phys Solids 1997;45:21–50.
[223] Fabrègue D, Pardoen T. A constitutive model for elasticplastic solids containing primary and secondary voids. J Mech Phys

Solids 2008;56:719–41.
[224] Fabrègue D, Pardoen T. Corrigendum to ‘‘A constitutive model for elasticplastic solids containing primary and secondary

voids’’. J Mech Phys Solids 2009;57:869–70.
[225] Pardoen T, Dumont D, Deschamps A, Bréchet Y. Grain boundary versus transgranular ductile failure. J Mech Phys Solids

2003;51:637–65.
[226] Steglich D, Brocks W, Heerens J, Pardoen T. Anisotropic ductile fracture of Al 2024 alloys. Eng Fract Mech

2008;75(12):3692–706.
87

Page 89

gr22.eps


[227] Pardoen T, Hutchinson JW. An extended model for void growth and coalescence. J Mech Phys Solids 2000;48:2467–512.
[228] Pardoen T, Hutchinson JW. Micromechanics-based model for trends in toughness of ductile metals. Acta Mater

2003;51:133–48.
[229] Tvergaard V. On localization in ductile materials containing voids. Int J Fract 1982;18:237–51.
[230] Needleman A, Tvergaard V. An analysis of ductile rupture in notched bars. J Mech Phys Solids 1984;32:461–90.
[231] Gologanu M, Leblond JB, Perrin G, Devaux J. Recent extensions of Gurson’s model for porous ductile metals. In: Suquet P,

editor. Continuum micromechanics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1995. p. 61–106.
[232] Eshelby JD. The determination of the elastic field of an ellipsoidal inclusion and related problems. Proc Roy Soc London,

Ser A 1957;241:376–96.
[233] Berveiller M, Zaoui A. An extension of the self-consistent scheme to plastically flowing polycrystals. J Mech Phys Solids

1979;26:325–40.
[234] Beremin FM. Cavity formation from inclusions in ductile fracture of A508 steel. Metal Trans A 1981;12:723–31.
[235] Berdin C. Damage evolution laws and fracture criteria. In: Besson J, editor. Local approach to fracture, Paris; 2004. p. 147–

74.
[236] Teko~glu C, Pardoen T. A micromechanics based damage model for composite materials. Int J Plasticity

2010;26(4):549–69.
[237] Pardoen T. Numerical simulation of low stress triaxiality ductile fracture. Comput Struct 2006;84(26–27):1641–50.
[238] Lecarme L, Tekoglu C, Pardoen T. Void growth and coalescence in ductile solids with stage III and stage IV strain

hardening. Int J Plasticity, in press, doi:10.1016/j.ijplas.2011.01.004.
[239] Scheyvaerts F, Pardoen T, Onck PR. A new model for void coalescence by internal necking. Int J Damage Mech

2010;19(1):95–126.
[240] Scheyvaerts F, Onck PR, Tekoglu C, Pardoen T. The growth and coalescence of ellipsoidal voids in plane strain under

combined shear and tension. J Mech Phys Solids 2011;59(2):373–97.
[241] Bron F, Besson J, Pineau A. Ductile rupture in thin sheets of two grades of 2024 aluminum alloy. Mater Sci Eng

2004;380A:356–64.
[242] Morgeneyer TF, Besson J, Proudhon H, Starink MJ, Sinclair I. Experimental and numerical analysis of toughness anisotropy

in AA2139 Al-alloy sheet. Acta Mater 2009;57:3902–15.
[243] Shabrov MN, Sylven E, Kim S, Sherman DH, Chuzhoy L, Briant CL, et al. Void nucleation by inclusion cracking. Metal Mater

Trans A 2004;35:1745–55.
[244] Lassance D, Scheyvaerts F, Pardoen T. Growth and coalescence of penny-shaped voids in metallic alloys. Eng Fract Mech

2006;73(8):1009–34.
[245] Simar A, Bréchet Y, de Meester B, Denquin A, Pardoen T. Microstructure, local and global mechanical properties of friction

stir welds in aluminium alloy 6005A-T6. Mater Sci Eng A 2008;486:85–95.
[246] Frigaard O, Grong O, Bjorneklett B, Midling O. Modelling of the thermal and microstructure fields during friction stir

welding of aluminium alloys. In: Proc 1st int symp FSW 1999, Thousand Oaks, California, USA; 1999.
[247] Colegrove PA, Shercliff HR. Experimental and numerical analysis of aluminium alloy 7075-T7351 friction stir welds. Sci

Technol Weld Join 2003;8(5):360–8.
[248] Hill R. A theory of the yielding and plastic flow of anisotropic metals. Proc Roy Soc London 1948;193:281–97.
[249] Staron P, Kocak M, Williams S. Residual stresses in friction stir welded Al sheets. Appl Phys A 2002;74:S1161–2.
[250] Luan G, Li G, Li C, Dong C. DC-LSND friction stir welding. In: Proc 7th int symp FSW 2008, Awaji Island, Japan; 2008.
[251] Richards DG, Prangnell PB, Withers PJ, Williams SW, Nagy T, Morgan S. Efficacy of active cooling for controlling residual

stresses in friction stir welds. Sci Technol Weld Join 2010;15(2):156–65.
[252] Dumolt SD, Laughlin DE, Williams JC. Formation of a modified b0 phase in aluminium alloy 6061. Scripta Metal

1984;18:1347–50.
[253] Heinz B, Skrotzki B. Characterization of a friction-stir-welded aluminum alloy 6013. Metal Mater Trans B

2002;33(3):489–98.
[254] Elangovan K, Balasubramanian V. Influences of post-weld heat treatment on tensile properties of friction stir-welded

AA6061 aluminum alloy joints. Mater Character 2008;59(9):1168–77.
[255] Deschamps A, Bley F, Livet F, Fabrègue D, David L. In-situ small-angle X-ray scattering study of dynamic precipitation in

an Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy. Philos Mag 2003;83(6):677–92.
[256] Zhang Z, Zhang HW. The simulation of residual stresses in friction stir welds. J Mech Mater Struct 2007;2(5):951–64.
[257] Qin XL, Michaleris P. Elasto-visco-plastic analysis of welding residual stress. Sci Technol Weld Join 2009;14(7):606–15.
[258] Fratini L, Macaluso G, Pasta S. Residual stresses and FCP prediction in FSW through a continuous FE model. J Mater

Process Technol 2009;15–16:5465–74.
[259] Xia L, Shih CF. Ductile crack growth. 1. A numerical study using computational cells with microstructurally-based length

scales. J Mech Phys Solids 1995;43(2):233–59.
[260] Negre P, Steglich D, Brocks W. Crack extension in aluminium welds: a numerical approach using the Gurson–Tvergaard–

Needleman model. Eng Fract Mech 2004;71:2365–83.
[261] Karabin ME, Barlat F, Shuey RT. Finite element modeling of plane strain toughness for 7085 aluminum alloy. Metal Mater

Trans A 2009;40A:354–76.
[262] Golestaneh AF, Ali A, Zadeh M. Modelling the fatigue crack growth in friction stir welded joint of 2024-T351 Al alloy.

Mater Des 2009(September):2928–37.
[263] Lim S, Kim S, Lee CG, Kim S. Stress corrosion cracking behavior of friction-stir-welded Al 6061-T651. Metal Mater Trans A

2005;36:1977–80.
[264] Blanc C, Freulon A, Lafont M-C, Kihn Y, Mankowski G. A Modelling the corrosion behaviour of Al2CuMg coarse particles in

copper-rich aluminium alloys. Corrosion Sci 2006;48:3838–51.
88

Similer Documents