Download District of Columbia live database - Electronic Frontier Foundation PDF

TitleDistrict of Columbia live database - Electronic Frontier Foundation
Author
LanguageEnglish
File Size3.7 MB
Total Pages94
Document Text Contents
Page 1

NO. 12-5363
__________________________________________________________________


ORAL ARGUMENT HAS NOT YET BEEN SCHEDULED

________________________________


IN THE
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
________________________________


ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION,


Plaintiff – Appellant,


v.


UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,


Defendant – Appellee.
________________________________


ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA


________________________________


JOINT APPENDIX
________________________________


David L. Sobel
ELECTRONIC FRONTIER
FOUNDATION
1818 N Street, N.W., Suite
410
Washington, DC 20036
(202) 797-9009

Counsel for Appellant

Mark Rumold
ELECTRONIC FRONTIER
FOUNDATION
815 Eddy Street
San Francisco, CA 94109
(415) 436-9333


Counsel for Appellant


Daniel Tenny
Michael S. Raab
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF

JUSTICE
950 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20530
(202) 514-1838

Counsel for Appellee

Page 2

! 1

TABLE OF CONTENTS


Appendix Page


Docket Entries ........................................................................................................... 1

Complaint

(May 19, 2011) ................................................................................................ 6

Defendant’s Answer to Complaint

(June 20, 2011) .............................................................................................. 12

Exhibits to
Government’s Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Support of Motion for
Summary Judgment

(November 10, 2011):


1. Declaration of Paul P. Colborn
(November 10, 2011) ................................................................ 18


2. (Corrected) Declaration of David M. Hardy

(December 13, 2011) ................................................................ 33

Exhibits to
Plaintiff’s Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary
Judgment and in Support of Plaintiff’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment
(December 13, 2011):

1. Excerpt from

Department of Justice, Office of Inspector General,
A Review of the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Use of Exigent
Letters and Other Informal Requests for Telephone Records

(January 2010) .......................................................................... 45

2. Memorandum for Attorneys of the Office, Re: Best Practices for OLC

Legal Advice and Written Opinions
By David Barron, Department of Justice

(July 16, 2010) .......................................................................... 53

Page 47

Case 1:11-cv-00939-RJL Document 12-1 Filed 12/13/11 Page 11 of 12

-43-

Page 48

Case 1:11-cv-00939-RJL Document 12-1 Filed 12/13/11 Page 12 of 12

-44-

Page 93

CONCLUSION

For all of the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS the defendant's Motion for

Summary Judgment [Dkt. #11] and DENIES plaintiffs Cross-Motion for Summary

Judgment [Dkt. #14]. An Order consistent with this decision accompanies this

Memorandum Opinion.

17

Case 1:11-cv-00939-RJL Document 22 Filed 09/21/12 Page 17 of 17

-89-

Page 94

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

ELECTRONIC FRONTIER
FOUNDATION,

Plaintiff,

v.
Civil Case No. 11-939 (RJL)

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Defendant.

ORDER St--
(September Y._, 2012)

For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion entered this date, it is this

.., sr-
-~_t_ day of September, 2012, hereby

ORDERED that defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. #11] is

GRANTED; it is further

ORDERED that plaintiffs Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. #14] is

DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

:;:L~
United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-00939-RJL Document 23 Filed 09/21/12 Page 1 of 1

-90-

Similer Documents