Download DfEE Early Excellence PDF

TitleDfEE Early Excellence
LanguageEnglish
File Size472.3 KB
Total Pages174
Document Text Contents
Page 1

Research Report
No 259











Research to Inform the
Evaluation of the Early
Excellence Centres Pilot

Programme





Christine Pascal, Tony Bertram, Michael Gasper, Claire Mould,
Fiona Ramsden, Maureen Saunders


Centre for Research in Early Childhood

University College Worcester













The Views expressed in this report are the authors' and do not necessarily reflect those of the Department for Education and Employment.

© Crown Copyright 2001. Published with the permission of DfEE on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office. Applications for
reproduction should be made in writing to The Crown Copyright Unit, Her Majesty's Stationery Office, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate,
Norwich NR3 1BQ.

ISBN 1 84185 477 8
February 2001

Page 87

80 DfEE Evaluating Early Excellence Centres


Table 10: Costing An EEC By Service Cost Method

Component Outlay Cost Imputable Cost Full Cost

Administration
Personnel £ £ £
Office Supplies £ £ £
Utilities £ £ £

Nursery Education
Personnel £ £ £
Consumables £ £ £

Day Care
Personnel £ £ £
Consumables £ £ £

Family Support
Personnel £ £ £
Consumables £ £ £

Adult Education
Personnel £ £ £
Consumables £ £ £

Food
Personnel £ £ £
Food £ £ £
Consumables £ £ £

Building and Facilities
Maintenance £ £ £
Personnel £ £ £
Rent £ £ £
Energy £ £ £

Transportation £ £ £

Etc.... £ £ £


Full Costs £ £ £

Page 88

81 DfEE Evaluating Early Excellence Centres




The costing shown in the second table allows for a better determination of the costs of providing

particular services included in the EEC programme. It should be noted that Table 10 groups together the

direct costs associated with each service offered within the EEC. It also groups together the overhead

costs or joint costs of the services such as administration and building. A proportion of these can then be

allocated to each of the services provided as indirect costs. This type of cost classification can be useful

for analysing the cost effectiveness of particular services within an overall programme, as well as the cost

effectiveness of the programme as a whole.





7.3.1.3 Calculating Cost Per Child Hour

This technique is described and promoted by the Audit Commission (1996b) for establishing the costing

for different forms of early childhood provision. Although the Audit Commission applied this technique

to non-integrated early childhood services, such as nursery classes, reception classes, preschools and

home visiting schemes, we believe that with some adaptation this approach is useful in the cost analysis

of integrated services for children and adults. The intention is to arrive at an easily applied calculation for

costing a service by cost per child hour or cost per adult hour or cost per family hour. Each of these

three cost calculations can be worked out using the same basic technique. We have found it is the most

commonly used basic cost calculation promoted by a range of national and international bodies working

in the field of cost effectiveness analysis. This includes the Audit Commission (1996b), the Inter-

American World Bank (Barnett 1996; Moran, Myers and Zymelman 1997), and the Cost, Quality and

Child Outcomes Study Group (1995).



This costing technique can be worked out using a cost tree (Audit Commission 1996b). A cost tree is a

set of figures on costs of services and usage of services. It is called a tree because the figures are laid out

on a page with links (or branches) showing their connections. An advantage of this approach is that it

lends itself to being incorporated into a computer spreadsheet, which allows ongoing revision and

updating, and comparison within and between services and EECs.



We have adapted the suggested cost tree methodology from the Audit Commission Report (1996b). The

adaptations have had to incorporate the multi-user and multi-focus services provided within the EECs in

order to demonstrate how the approach can be applied to the range of services for both children and adults

which operate within the Centres. It may also be used to cost EEC services for families as a whole. We

have described the basic methodology using cost per child hour within an EEC, focusing on those

services within the EEC that cater for children. However, it should be noted that the same technique can

be used for working out cost per adult hour or cost per family hour and the computer program is being

developed to provide these options.



Table 11 sets out the cost tree for EEC children’s services and identifies five stages in the cost analysis,

represented by Columns A, B, C, D and E of the table. Column E of the tree is used to enter basic

financial and other data about the identified services provided for children within the EEC. These data

should be the best available for describing the full range of services, their availability, take up and the

costs of these services. Before the cost tree can be completed, the costing of the services for children must

be calculated using the methods suggested earlier. Also, data must be available on the sessions offered

Page 173

166 DfEE Evaluating Early Excellence Centres




Office for Standards in Education (1999) Primary Education 1994 - 1998: A Review of Schools in
England, HMSO, London.

Oliver, C., Smith, M. and Barker, S. (1998) Effectiveness of Early Interventions, Thomas Coram Research
Unit, Institute of Education, London.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (1999) The Norway Background Paper,
Organisation for Economic and Community Development, Paris (Unpublished).

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (1998) Early Childhood Education and Care
Policy: Proposal for a Thematic Review, Organisation for Economic and Community Development,
Paris.

Pascal C., Bertram A.D., Ramsden F., Georgeson J., Saunders M. and Mould C. (1998) Effective Early
Learning: Evaluating and Developing Quality in Early Childhood Settings, Amber Publications,
Worcester.

Pascal, C. and Bertram, A.D. (1999) Accounting Early for Life Long Learning: the AcE Project, Amber
Publications, Worcester.

Pascal, C., Bertram, A.D. and Gattis, S (1999) Parent Partnership Scale: Effective Early Learning
Project, Amber Publications, Worcester.

Pascal, C. and Bertram, A.D. (2000) First Findings, Autumn 1999, DfEE Publications.

Phillips, D. (1995) Giving Voice to Young Children, European Early Childhood Education Research
Journal, Vol.3, No. 2, pp5-15, Amber Publications, Worcester.

Pugh, G. (1988) Services for Under Fives: Developing a Coordinated Approach, National Childrens
Bureau, London.

Ruggie, M. (1984) The State and Working Women: a comparative study of Britain and Sweden, Princeton
University Press, Princeton, NJ

Rutter, M. (1996) Stress, Research Accomplishments and Tasks Ahead, pp354 - 384 in Haggerty, R. J.
and Sherrod, L.R. (Eds.) (1996) Stress, Risks and Resilience in Children and Adolescents: Processes,
Mechanisms and Interventions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Schweinhart, L.J., Barnes H.V. and Weikart, D.P.(1993) Significant Benefits: The High/Scope Perry
Preschool Project Through Age 27, High/Scope Educational Research Foundation, High/Scope Press,
USA.

Schweinhart, L.J. and Weikart, D.P. (1997) Lasting Differences, the High/Scope Preschool Curriculum
Comparison, High/Scope Educational Research Foundation, High/Scope Press, USA.

Page 174

167 DfEE Evaluating Early Excellence Centres




Shore, R. (1997) Rethinking the Brain: New Insights into Early Development, Families and Work
Institute, New York.

Slavin, R.E., Karweit, N.L. and Wasik, B.A. (1994) Preventing Early School Failure, Allyn and Bacon,
Needham Heights, MA.

Smith, T. (1999) Socio-Mapping Techniques and Early Childhood Provision, Presentation given to a
DfEE symposium on Evaluating Early Excellence Centres, Institute of Mechanical Engineers, May 1999.

Social Exclusion Unit (1998) Truancy and School Exclusion, OHMS, London.

Social Exclusion Unit (1999a) Bridging the Gap, OHMS, London.

Social Exclusion Unit (1999b) Report on Teenage Pregnancy, OHMS, London.

Sylva, K., Roy, C. & Painter, M., (1980) Childwatching at Playgroup and Nursery School , Oxford
Preschool Research Project, Grant-McIntyre, London.

Sylva, K. and Wiltshire, J. (1993) The Impact of Early Learning on Children’s Later Development,
European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, Vol.1, No.1, pp17-41.

Sylva K., Melhuish E., Sammons P. and Siraj-Blatchford I. (1998) The Effective Preschool Provision
(EPPE) Project, London Institute.

Tichelar, M. (1997) Performance Indicators, Policy and Performance Review Network, The Local
Government Management Board, London.

Tietze, W. (1987) A structural model for the evaluation of preschool effects, Early Childhood Research
Quarterly, 2(2), pp133-153.

Woodhead, M (1999) Universality in Early Childhood Values, European Early Childhood Education
Research Journal, Volume 7, No.1, pp. 5-23.

Young, M.E. (1996) Investing in Young Children, Discussion Paper No.275, World Bank, Washington,
DC.

Similer Documents